*2024/11/29 15:12:27.99 *IOS HEADER VERSION 2.0 2016/04/28 2016/06/13 IVF16 *FILE START TIME : UTC 2024/08/15 19:06:00.000 NUMBER OF RECORDS : 3 DATA DESCRIPTION : Bottle:Wire + CTD:Down FILE TYPE : ASCII NUMBER OF CHANNELS : 21 $TABLE: CHANNELS ! No Name Units Minimum Maximum !--- ---------------------------- --------------- -------------- -------------- 1 Pressure decibar 1.498 303.496 2 Depth metres 1.5 300.7 3 Temperature:Primary 'deg C (ITS90)' 9.4112 19.7078 4 Fluorescence:URU:Wetlabs mg/m^3 0.35E-01 0.571 5 Salinity:T0:C0 PSS-78 27.4118 30.8638 6 PAR uE/m^2/sec 0.1 418.6 7 Oxygen:Dissolved:SBE mL/L 2.93 5.83 8 Oxygen:Dissolved:SBE umol/kg 127.8096 255.4794 9 Conductivity:Primary S/m 3.36426 3.826543 10 Sample_Number n/a 25 32 11 Salinity:Bottle PSS-78 27.4217 30.866 12 Flag:Salinity:Bottle n/a 13 Nitrate_plus_Nitrite umol/L 0.7E-01 29.18 14 Flag:Nitrate_plus_Nitrite n/a 15 Silicate umol/L 25.12 65.84 16 Flag:Silicate n/a 17 Phosphate umol/L 0.281 2.685 18 Flag:Phosphate n/a 19 Chlorophyll:Extracted mg/m^3 0.73 0.93 20 Flag:Chlorophyll:Extracted n/a 21 Phaeo-Pigment:Extracted mg/m^3 0.32 0.93 $END $TABLE: CHANNEL DETAIL ! No Pad Start Width Format Type Decimal_Places !--- ---- ----- ----- ------ ---- -------------- 1 -99 ' ' 7 F R4 1 2 -99 ' ' 7 F R4 1 3 -99 ' ' 9 F R4 4 4 -99 ' ' 8 F R4 3 5 -99 ' ' 9 F R4 4 6 -99 ' ' 7 F R4 1 7 -99 ' ' 7 F R4 2 8 -99 ' ' 6 F ' ' 1 9 -99 ' ' 10 F R4 5 10 -99 ' ' 5 I I 0 11 -99 ' ' 9 F R4 4 12 ' ' ' ' 3 NQ C ' ' 13 -99 ' ' 7 F R4 2 14 ' ' ' ' 3 NQ C ' ' 15 -99 ' ' 7 F R4 2 16 ' ' ' ' 3 NQ C ' ' 17 -99 ' ' 8 F R4 3 18 ' ' ' ' 3 NQ C ' ' 19 -99 ' ' 7 F R4 2 20 ' ' ' ' 3 NQ C ' ' 21 -99 ' ' 7 F R4 2 $END $REMARKS Quality flags have the following significance: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 = Acceptable measurement with no header comment 1 = Sample for this measurement was collected but not analyzed. Sample lost. 2 = Acceptable measurement with header comment 3 = Questionable measurement (Probably Good) 4 = Poor measurement (Probably Bad) 5 = Measurement not reported (Bad) 6 = Mean of replicate measurements 7 = Manual chromatographic peak measurement 8 = Irregular digital chromatographic peak integration 9 = Sample was planned for this measurement from this bottle but was not collected ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $END *ADMINISTRATION MISSION : 2024-070 AGENCY : IOS, Ocean Sciences Division, Sidney, B.C. COUNTRY : Canada PROJECT : Strait of Georgia Plankton SCIENTIST : Young K. PLATFORM : Richardson Point *LOCATION GEOGRAPHIC AREA : Strait of Georgia STATION : 12 EVENT NUMBER : 39 LATITUDE : 49 43.60920 N ! (deg min) LONGITUDE : 124 40.77300 W ! (deg min) WATER DEPTH : 350 *INSTRUMENT TYPE : Sea-Bird CTD MODEL : SBE-25 SERIAL NUMBER : 1255 *HISTORY $TABLE: PROGRAMS ! Name Vers Date Time Recs In Recs Out ! -------- ------ ---------- -------- --------- --------- SPRD2IS 5.3.1 2024/11/29 13:40:47 3 3 CLEAN 5.3 2024/11/29 13:40:56 3 3 CALIB 12.1 2024/11/29 13:49:02 3 3 CHGUNITS 3.2 2024/11/29 13:58:38 3 3 REORDER 1.3.1 2024/11/29 13:58:53 ? ? REMOVECH 8.2 2024/11/29 13:58:58 3 3 HDREDIT2 3.2 2024/11/29 15:12:27 ? ? $END $REMARKS -CLEAN functions: 2024/11/29 13:40:56 20 Reset #RECS, MIN & MAX values in header. Change character data from " " to "0" in channels Flag:* Delete Empty Channels: 0 deleted. Set header Start and End times from the data. -CALIB parameters: 2024/11/29 13:49:02 Calibration type = Correct Mode: ONLY - calibration specs from Cal File only. Calibration file = E:\Telework\2024-070\Processing\doc\2024-070-recal-SIL.CCF Calibrations applied: Ch Name Units Fmla Coefficents -- ----------------------------- --------- --- ----------------------------- 19 Silicate umol/L 120 0.9040000E+00 0.3000000E-02 0.2500000E+02 Salinity:T0:C0 -CHANGE units: Temperature reference channel: Temperature:Primary Salinity reference channel: Salinity:T0:C0 'Oxygen:Dissolved:SBE' changed from mL/L to umol/kg -REMOVECH 2024/11/29 13:58:58 The following CHANNEL(S) were removed: Date TIME:UTC -HEADER EDITS: 2024/11/29 15:12:27 Applied edit header: E:\Telework\2024-070\Processing\doc\HYDRO\2024-070-bot-hdr.txt Channel 1: Pressure [decibar] Format: F9.4 ==> F7.1 Channel 9: Conductivity:Primary [S/m] Format: F10.6 ==> F10.5 $END *COMMENTS Sample_Number 31: CHL: CV%>10 Sample_Number 25: SAL: poor agreement between replicates Analysis methods: ----------------------- Salinity samples were collected in 200 mL type II glass bottles with disposable nylon inserts and screw caps supplied by Ocean Scientific International Limited. They were analyzed in a temperature-controlled lab on a Guildline 8400B Salinometer standardized with IAPSO standard seawater within 19-23 days after collection. For details, see document QF2024-070SAL*.xlsx. Nutrient samples were collected in plastic tubes and quick frozen in aluminum blocks stored in a -20C freezer. All samples were returned to the Institute of Ocean Sciences and they were analyzed using an Astoria-Pacific Analyzer following methods described in IOS Nutrient Methods (1996) Barwell-Clarke, J. and F. Whitney. For details see document QF2024-070_NUTS*.xlsx. Chlorophyll samples were filtered onto 25mm GF/F filters after collection, and immediately frozen and stored in a -80C freezer. All samples were returned to the Institute of Ocean Sciences and analyzed 6 weeks after collection on a Turner Trilogy7200-000 fluorometer. Fluorescence readings taken before and after sample acidification were used to calculate chlorophyll and phaeopigment concentrations. For further details on methodology, see document QF 2024-0700_CHL_*.xlsx Methodology sheet. NOTE: Flags and comments apply to chlorophyll values only. No flags or comments are assigned for Phaeo-Pigment values. References: 1. Barwell-Clarke, J. and Whitney, F. 1996. Institute of Ocean Sciences Nutrient Methods and Analysis. Canadian Technical Report of Hydrography and Ocean Sciences, No. 182, 43 pp. 2. Nemcek, N. and Peņa, M.A. 2014. Institute of Ocean Sciences Protocols for Phytoplankton Pigment Analysis by HPLC. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 3117: x + 80 p. * For PDF versions of these papers see folder \\Cruise_Data\DOCUMENTS\Analysis Reference Papers ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CTD Data Processing Notes: ---------------------- NOTE: The CTD data in these files were extracted from CTD casts and are not from exactly the same time or depth as the samples. The data are provided only as a rough guide to ambient conditions. Surface samples were collected while the CTD was soaking at 10m during regular CTD casts. At 3 sites a special chito CTD cast was run immediately after the regular CTD cast and sampling was done at 5db and 1db above the bottom of the cast. CTD data were extracted as close the surface as possible from regular casts, and for the 5db and deep samples, data were extracted from the chito casts. Oxygen:Dissolved, Conductivity, PAR and Fluorescence:URU:Wetlabs data are nominal and unedited except that some records were removed in editing temperature and salinity. There were only 6 salinity calibration samples taken during this cruise, of which only 3 were below 5m. The CTD data were lower than the deeper bottle samples by an average of about 0.001psu; the CTD may be reading low by a little more than that suggests, due to incomplete flushing of Niskin bottles. Salinity is likely good to +/-0.005psu. 10 extracted chlorophyll samples were collected at the surface using a bucket, while the CTD was soaking at 10m during a regular CTD cast. 3 samples from 5m came from a Niskin bottle during chito casts. The ratio of CTD Fluorescence to Extracted CHL samples was somewhat lower than usually seen especially at the low end of the range, but it is consistent with other uses of this equipment during 4 other 2024 cruises in the same area. Oxygen:Dissolved:SBE values cannot be confirmed as there was no calibration sampling for dissolved oxygen. Surface saturation values were all between 100% and 135% except for station 56 where it was 65%. That is a site of active mixing. It is likely that SBE dissolved oxygen values are slightly low, with typical errors for these sensor being from 1% to 3%. For details on the processing see document: 2024-070_Processing_Report.doc. *CALIBRATION $TABLE: CORRECTED CHANNELS ! Name Units Fmla Pad Coefficients ! ---------- -------- ---- ------ ------------ Silicate umol/L 120 -99 (Salinity:T0:C0) (0.904 0.3E-02 25) $END !--1--- --2--- ---3---- ---4--- ---5---- --6--- --7--- --8-- ----9---- -10- ---11--- 12 --13-- 14 --15-- 16 ---17-- 18 --19-- 20 --21-- !Pressu Depth Temperat Fluores Salinity PAR Oxygen Oxyge Conductiv Samp Salinity Fl Nitrat Fl Silica Fl Phospha Fl Chloro Fl Phaeo- !re ure: cence: :T0:C0 : n: ity: le_ :Bottle ag e_ ag te ag te ag phyll: ag Pigmen ! Primary URU: Dissol Disso Primary Numb ~o plus_ ~t ~i ~p Extrac ~a t: ! Wetlabs ved: lved: er tt Nitrit ri ca ha ted ct Extrac ! SBE SBE le e te te te ed ted !------ ------ -------- ------- -------- ------ ------ ----- --------- ---- -------- -- ------ -- ------ -- ------- -- ------ -- ------ *END OF HEADER 1.5 1.5 19.7078 0.306 27.4184 332.6 5.70 249.8 3.82654 32 -99.0000 0 0.07 0 25.12 0 0.281 0 0.73 0 0.32 5.0 5.0 19.4038 0.571 27.4118 418.6 5.83 255.5 3.80097 31 27.4217 6 -99.00 0 -99.00 0 -99.000 0 0.93 36 0.93 303.5 300.7 9.4112 0.035 30.8638 0.1 2.93 127.8 3.36426 25 30.8660 46 29.18 6 65.84 6 2.685 6 -99.00 0 -99.00